WM-800B vs WM-800C
Two sizes of the same frame. The difference that decides the order is usually aisle width or the weight of a full pallet — not the number on the plate.
| WM-800B | WM-800C | |
|---|---|---|
| Model | WM-800B | WM-800C |
| Rated capacity | 800 mm | 800 mm |
| Operating weight | [object Object] | [object Object] |
| capacity | 4-seat | 4-seat |
| standard | WC2+2A | WC2+2A |
| power | Electric | Electric |
Rows that differ are marked. Rows without a mark are identical on both builds.
Choose WM-800B when
As the 800A with double-row track rollers, for sustained heavy growth.
The building is the constraint: floor loading, door width, or a mezzanine that will not take the heavier chassis. WM-800B is also the cheaper unit, so a fleet that never loads to the plate should not pay for the frame it does not use.
WM-800B specificationChoose WM-800C when
800 mm deck on the 23 hp engine. The build for contractors running long shifts.
The load is the constraint: pallets that arrive over-weight, attachments that shift the centre of gravity forward, or a mast tall enough that residual capacity falls away at height. Buying one size up is cheaper than a second handling step.
WM-800C specificationNot sure which one
Send the aisle width, the load and the lift height. We answer with the model and the reason, not both brochures.